Canada Journal – News of the World Articles and videos to bring you the biggest Canadian news stories from across the country every day
The plan to build to build the next generation of space taxis to take astronauts to the International Space Station has hit a big bump in the road.
After rewarding Boeing and SpaceX with the contracts to build the spacecrafts NASA is now asking the companies to stop their work on the project.
The move comes after aerospace company Sierra Nevada filed a protest of the decision after losing out on the bid.
Sierra Nevada was competing against Boeing and SpaceX for a share of the $6.8 billion CCP contracts. The contracts will cover all phases of development as well as testing and operational flights. Each contract will cover a minimum of two flights and a maximum of four, with each agency required to have one test flight with a NASA representative on board.
On Sept. 16, NASA announced who the winners were of the Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (CCtCAP) contracts. Sierra Nevada then filed a protest with the GAO on Sept. 26, and issued a statement saying the protest was asking for: “a further detailed review and evaluation of the submitted proposals and capabilities.”
According to NASA’s Public Affairs Office, this legal protest stops all work currently being done under these contracts. However, officials have not commented on whether-or-not the companies can continue working if they are using private funds.
The GAO officially has until Jan. 5 to rule on the protest, but could issue their response in as little as a few weeks. If the GAO decides in favor of Sierra Nevada, NASA could either re-compete the contracts or change its decision. As part of their challenge, Sierra Nevada stated the following: “there were serious questions and inconsistencies in the source selection process.”
In a press release, Sierra Nevada said: “SNC believes the result of further evaluation of the proposals submitted will be that America ends up with a more capable vehicle, at a much lower cost, with a robust and sustainable future.”
NASA has yet to release any contract specifics and has not revealed why Boeing and SpaceX were chosen over Sierra Nevada, who’s Dream Chaser spacecraft possesses the ability to conducted a controlled landing on a runway as opposed to Boeing’s CST-1oo or SpaceX’s Dragon V.2 – which splash down in the ocean. Dream Chaser, a lifting wing bodied design, is a mini shuttle which bears some resemblance to NASA’s retired fleet of orbiters.
Currently, both Boeing and SpaceX are on track to begin launching crews by the year 2017, but any delays as a result of this protest, may push that date back further.
Agencies/Canadajournal
“…Dream Chaser spacecraft possesses the ability to conducted a controlled landing on a runway as opposed to Boeing’s CST-1oo or SpaceX’s Dragon V.2 – which splash down in the ocean. ”
SpaceX’s Dragon V.2 – is designed to do a controlled soft landing using rocket brakes.
The Dragon v2 is designed for water splashdowns. There are no guarantees the Draco system will be able to make a soft landing and even if it does, the Dragon v2 will still need the ability to splashdown in case of a Draco failure. I think it will work but Musk is right including a separate landing system. That increases passenger safety and gives the Dragon one backup landing system while the other two competitors will not have redundancy.
SpaceX’s Dragon V.2 does not splash down in the ocean. It will land on the ground.
Nothing like going backwards again. I will never forget when then usa start using Russien rocket engings RD180 for atlas. i knew one day we will suffer for this as thousands of people got layoff. Cheper better faster.
Now we are chasing our own butt trying to bulid something just to get to space station and back. What a fool we are when we did nothing when the space shuttle porgram came to a stop.