Friday , 29 March 2024
Home » World » Timothy Tyrone Foster: Supreme Court rules for inmate in jury selection case
Timothy Tyrone Foster: Supreme Court rules for inmate in jury selection case
Timothy Tyrone Foster: Black man sent to death row by all-white jury has sentence thrown out by Supreme Court

Timothy Tyrone Foster: Supreme Court rules for inmate in jury selection case

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of death row inmate Timothy Tyrone Foster on Monday in a case concerning racial discrimination in the jury selection process. Foster, a black man, is on death row in Georgia for the 1987 murder of an elderly white woman. An all-white jury convicted him after prosecutors unconstitutionally blocked African-American jurors from the trial.

In a 7-1 ruling, the court handed a victory to inmate Timothy Foster, 48, who asserted prosecutorial misconduct after he was convicted and sentenced to death in the 1986 murder of Queen White, a 79-year-old retired schoolteacher.

The justices threw out Foster’s conviction after decades on death row. He could still potentially face a retrial.

During jury selection, all four black members of the pool of potential jurors were removed by prosecutors, who gave reasons not related to race for their decision to exclude them. Only white jurors were selected for the panel that ended up convicting Foster and sentencing him to death.

Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court’s majority, wrote that prosecution notes introduced into evidence “plainly belie the state’s claim that it exercised its strikes (removing a potential juror) in a ‘colour blind’ manner.”

At the time of the trial, Foster’s legal arguments over jury selection failed. It was only in 2006 that his lawyers obtained access to the prosecution’s jury selection notes, which showed that the race of the black potential jurors was highlighted, indicating “an explicit reliance on race,” according to Foster’s attorneys.

The notes showed that the prosecution marked the names of the black prospective jurors with a “B,” highlighted them in green and circled the word “black” next to the race question on juror questionnaires.

The Supreme Court reached the conclusion that the state’s prosecutors “were motivated in substantial part by race” when two of the potential jurors were excluded, Roberts wrote.

Justice Clarence Thomas, a conservative and the only black member of the court, was the sole dissenter.

A 1986 US Supreme Court ruling made it unlawful to take race into account when excluding potential jurors from a trial.

Prosecutors say Foster, 18 at the time of the crime, broke into White’s home in the middle of the night, broke her jaw and sexually molested the elderly woman before strangling her and stealing items from her house.

Agencies/Canadajournal




  • About News

    Web articles – via partners/network co-ordinators. This website and its contents are the exclusive property of ANGA Media Corporation . We appreciate your feedback and respond to every request. Please fill in the form or send us email to: [email protected]

    Leave a Reply